If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore Click to find out more shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.