If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.