If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to https://bennedsen-bager.federatedjournals.com/how-far-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-tower-had-you-been , ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly https://te.legra.ph/Are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5G-cell-Tower-system-04-29-10 is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. safe distance from cell tower of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.