If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, what is a safe distance from a cell tower and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. https://etextpad.com/ could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.