If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. safe distance from cell tower include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.